[PATCH 1/1] emit settings signal before active signal
Xu, Martin
martin.xu at intel.com
Sun Nov 22 21:06:11 PST 2009
Marcel:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ofono-bounces at ofono.org [mailto:ofono-bounces at ofono.org] On Behalf
> Of Marcel Holtmann
> Sent: Sunday, November 22, 2009 2:14 AM
> To: ofono at ofono.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] emit settings signal before active signal
>
> Hi Martin
>
> > ---
> > src/gprs.c | 13 +++++++------
> > 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> quick question on why? I did remember that Denis and I talked about on
> IRC, but I forgot what our conclusion on the order of these two signals
> was. We should really document this. Do you remember? And please prepare
> a patch that also puts a comment about this in the API documentation.
I can find below log
(2:02:38 AM) holtmann: Not sure if we need the Settings empty, but for completion it makes sense.
(2:03:05 AM) holtmann: We might wanna emit the Settings empty before Activated false, so that ConnMan can clean up the interface before it goes away.
(2:03:27 AM) denkenz: What's the difference?
(2:03:54 AM) denkenz: strictly speaking we shouldn't even bother for empty settings
(2:04:05 AM) denkenz: useless signal anyway
(2:04:13 AM) holtmann: Yeah. Just easier for some code path in ConnMan.
(2:04:49 AM) denkenz: holtmann: ok, that's simple enough anyway
I cannot find the conclusion on active TRUE order. But I think it should the same with active FALSE.
So ConnMan can setup interface before set network connected.
More information about the ofono
mailing list