[PATCH 02/11] Add framework of server parser
Denis Kenzior
denkenz at gmail.com
Wed Mar 17 10:55:59 PDT 2010
Hi Zhenhua,
> a. The parser fetch and parse one command per loop. The prefix is
> the command prefix without parameter. For example, the prefix of
> "AT+CLIP=1" is "+CLIP".
>
> b. Search registered notification node in command_list. Invoke the
> callback if found.
>
> c. Termiate the execution if the result is an error. Otherwise,
> parse next command.
> ---
> gatchat/gatserver.c | 95
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 files changed,
95
> insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gatchat/gatserver.c b/gatchat/gatserver.c
> index 46fa423..fb82ad4 100644
> --- a/gatchat/gatserver.c
> +++ b/gatchat/gatserver.c
> @@ -173,8 +173,103 @@ static void g_at_server_send_final(GAtServer *server,
> GAtServerResult result) send_common(server, buf, MIN(len, sizeof(buf)-1));
> }
>
> +static inline gboolean is_extended_command_prefix(const char c)
> +{
> + switch (c) {
> + case '+':
> + case '*':
> + case '!':
> + case '%':
> + return TRUE;
> + default:
> + return FALSE;
> + }
> +}
So I don't see the point of a patch that removes the entire function, then
puts the same function back in with the same name. If you want to rename it,
send a patch to do so.
> static void server_parse_line(GAtServer *server, char *line)
> {
> + GAtServerResult res = G_AT_SERVER_RESULT_ERROR;
> + char *buf = line;
> + char *command = NULL;
> + char prefix[20];
> +
> + while (buf) {
So this part is wrong, buf will never be NULL. I suggest you preserve the
logic of the current implementation here.
> + char c = *buf;
> +
> + /* skip semicolon */
> + if (c == ';')
> + c = *(++buf);
> +
> + if (c == '\0') {
> + res = G_AT_SERVER_RESULT_OK;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + command = parse_next_command(server, buf, prefix);
> + if (!command) {
> + res = G_AT_SERVER_RESULT_ERROR;
> + break;
> + }
Why is a char * being allocated by parse_next_command? What is the purpose?
I suggest you get rid of this and perform notifications there. It is too hard
to keep track of who should free what and where otherwise.
> +
> + res = at_command_notify(server, command, prefix);
I've mentioned this before, I don't like returning a result here. We should
simply store the last result given to g_at_server_send_final or
g_at_server_send_ext_final (e.g. do not send it out right away). If it is not
OK then quit command processing and send the final result.
> + if (res != G_AT_SERVER_RESULT_OK) {
> + g_free(command);
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + buf += strlen(command);
> +
> + g_free(command);
> + }
> +
> + g_at_server_send_final(server, res);
> +
> g_free(line);
> }
>
More information about the ofono
mailing list