[PATCH 0/6] PPP Patches v3
Kristen Carlson Accardi
kristen at linux.intel.com
Tue Mar 23 10:34:02 PDT 2010
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:45:14 -0700
Marcel Holtmann <marcel at holtmann.org> wrote:
> And there was another problem with one variable being
> guint16, but the is_option casts it back to guint8. We can't really have
> that. Once you start casting on that scale the compiler will not warn
> you about type mismatches or if the value of argument is too big for its
> type.
Can you please let me know which git commit this fix you made was? I
want to review it because all of the option types should only be a byte
anyway, so I am trying to figure out if there was a mistake somewhere
where we were using is_option to examine a 16 bit value. I searched
through the git log and can't figure out where this change was. I
can see where you changed the option type we are comparing to a regular
guint to avoid compiler problems, but not the other issue you mentioned.
More information about the ofono
mailing list