Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy(a)c-s.fr> writes:
Le 30/04/2020 à 16:13, kbuild test robot a écrit :
> tree: https://github.com/linuxppc/linux
> head: 7d204d846b04d0a1b4d3712736029fbf2e7a7359
> commit: 5bb3b9d986426296507d3ef58d1e5fe4625de01f [48/49] uaccess: Rename
user_access_begin/end() to user_full_access_begin/end()
> config: i386-tinyconfig (attached as .config)
> compiler: gcc-7 (Ubuntu 7.5.0-6ubuntu2) 7.5.0
> git checkout 5bb3b9d986426296507d3ef58d1e5fe4625de01f
> # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> make ARCH=i386
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp(a)intel.com>
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> arch/x86/kernel/signal.c: In function '__setup_frame':
>>> arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:312:7: error: implicit declaration of function
'user_access_begin'; did you mean 'user_access_end'?
> if (!user_access_begin(frame, sizeof(*frame)))
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
I see you took the entire series.
The problem is that people added additional uses of user_access_begin()
after I submitted the series.
In the meantime, Linus has suggested to keep the original name of the
function and drop patch 5 (see discussion at
Yep sorry for the spam.
I forgot to drop the last patch before I pushed, and then the build bot
picked it up.
I've dropped the rename patch now.