[PATCH_v4 0/5] Private network request to ConnMan
by Guillaume Zajac
Hi,
Changelog from v3 is:
- Add private-network source/include
- ConnMan plugin is independant from emulator
- Each application that need VPN will pass a callback as argument
when private network is requested. This callback will contain the
private network settings.
Guillaume Zajac (5):
gatppp: Add new contructor to use external fd
private-network: add callback typedef drivers and settings
private-network: add request/release functions and new feature to
Makefile.am
emulator: add request/release private network calls
connman: add plugin in oFono to request request/release private
network
Makefile.am | 10 +-
gatchat/gatppp.c | 33 +++++-
gatchat/gatppp.h | 1 +
gatchat/ppp.h | 2 +-
gatchat/ppp_net.c | 40 ++++---
include/private-network.h | 59 +++++++++
plugins/connman.c | 297 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
src/emulator.c | 49 ++++++--
src/ofono.h | 6 +
src/private-network.c | 89 ++++++++++++++
10 files changed, 556 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 include/private-network.h
create mode 100644 plugins/connman.c
create mode 100644 src/private-network.c
5 days, 22 hours
Read/Write EFcfis/EFcphs-cff files
by Jeevaka Badrappan
Hi,
This patch reads and writes the call forwarding unconditional status
from and to the SIM depending on the SIM file availability.
New property needs to be added due to the fact that number won't be
available from the cphs-cff file.
Incase of SIM, EFcphs-cff file holds call forwarding status and it
is represented as a flag. In case of USIM(EFcfis), we have the status
flag and also number.So, adding new property for status and using the
existing VoiceUnconditional with number will work for both SIM and USIM cases.
Other option is to have 2 properties, "VoiceUnconditional" and "Number".
"VoiceUnconditional" will have the status of the call forwarding( "enabled",
"disabled") whereas the "Number" property will have the call forwared number.
offline-online state transitions results in caching the call forwaring status
every time. To avoid this, call forwarding atom is moved to the post sim and
its moved also due to the fact that call forwarding status doesn't change in
roaming.
Regards,
Jeevaka
Jeevaka Badrappan (7):
call-forwarding: Read/Write cfis/cphs-cff
ifx: Move call forwarding to post sim
isigen: Move call forwarding to post sim
plugins/n900: Move call forwarding to post sim
phonesim: Move call forwarding to post sim
doc: Add new property to call forwarding
TODO: Marking the Read/Write EFcfis task as done
TODO | 9 --
doc/call-forwarding-api.txt | 5 +
doc/features.txt | 5 +
plugins/ifx.c | 2 +-
plugins/isigen.c | 2 +-
plugins/n900.c | 2 +-
plugins/phonesim.c | 3 +-
src/call-forwarding.c | 242 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
8 files changed, 256 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
6 days, 3 hours
[PATCH] Simcom support
by Anthony Viallard
Add SIMCOM support.
I developped this with the SIM5216E chipset and ofono 1.12.
- SMS and GPRS work (in the same time) ;
- SIM card presence check ;
- No voice part because I can't test it ;
- Use default characters set instead GSM because it works like that
for what I'm doing (SMS+GPRS) (by default, the set is IRA for SIM5216E).
Also, the SIMCOM doc affraids me about problems when using GSM
(this setting causes easily software flow control (XON /XOFF) problems.).
Signed-off-by: Anthony Viallard <homer242 at gmail.com>
--- ofono-1.12.orig/Makefile.am 2012-04-20 21:06:29.000000000 +0200
+++ ofono-1.12/Makefile.am 2013-01-21 17:17:48.089627277 +0100
@@ -371,6 +371,9 @@ builtin_sources += plugins/samsung.c
builtin_modules += sim900
builtin_sources += plugins/sim900.c
+builtin_modules += simcom
+builtin_sources += plugins/simcom.c
+
if BLUETOOTH
builtin_modules += bluetooth
builtin_sources += plugins/bluetooth.c plugins/bluetooth.h
--- ofono-1.12.orig/drivers/atmodem/sms.c 2012-04-20 21:06:29.000000000 +0200
+++ ofono-1.12/drivers/atmodem/sms.c 2013-01-21 16:48:44.460627485 +0100
@@ -805,6 +807,7 @@ static gboolean build_cnmi_string(char *
case OFONO_VENDOR_NOVATEL:
case OFONO_VENDOR_HUAWEI:
case OFONO_VENDOR_ZTE:
+ case OFONO_VENDOR_SIMCOM:
/* MSM devices advertise support for mode 2, but return an
* error if we attempt to actually use it. */
mode = "1";
diff -pruN ofono-1.12.orig/drivers/atmodem/sim.c ofono-1.12/drivers/atmodem/sim.c
--- ofono-1.12.orig/drivers/atmodem/sim.c 2013-01-23 11:38:22.959609087 +0100
+++ ofono-1.12/drivers/atmodem/sim.c 2013-01-23 11:57:52.602608948 +0100
@@ -1023,12 +1023,18 @@ static void at_pin_send_cb(gboolean ok,
FALSE, cbd, g_free);
return;
case OFONO_VENDOR_ZTE:
case OFONO_VENDOR_ALCATEL:
case OFONO_VENDOR_HUAWEI:
+ case OFONO_VENDOR_SIMCOM:
/*
* On ZTE modems, after pin is entered, SIM state is checked
* by polling CPIN as their modem doesn't provide unsolicited
* notification of SIM readiness.
+ *
+ * On SIMCOM modems, SIM is busy after pin is entered (we've
+ * got an "+CME ERROR: 14" at "AT+CPIN?" request) and ofono
+ * don't catch the "+CPIN: READY" message sent by the modem
+ * when SIM is ready. So, use extra CPIN to check the state.
*/
sd->sim_state_query = at_util_sim_state_query_new(sd->chat,
2, 20, sim_state_cb, cbd,
diff -purN ofono-1.12/drivers/atmodem/network-registration.c ofono-patched/drivers/atmodem/network-registration.c
--- ofono-1.12/drivers/atmodem/network-registration.c 2013-01-18 15:04:03.598659165 +0100
+++ ofono-patched/drivers/atmodem/network-registration.c 2013-01-18 14:54:03.256659236 +0100
@@ -1411,6 +1411,14 @@ static void at_creg_set_cb(gboolean ok,
}
switch (nd->vendor) {
+ case OFONO_VENDOR_SIMCOM:
+ /* Register for CSQ changes */
+ g_at_chat_send(nd->chat, "AT+AUTOCSQ=1,1", none_prefix,
+ NULL, NULL, NULL);
+
+ g_at_chat_register(nd->chat, "+CSQ:",
+ csq_notify, FALSE, netreg, NULL);
+ break;
case OFONO_VENDOR_PHONESIM:
g_at_chat_register(nd->chat, "+CSQ:",
csq_notify, FALSE, netreg, NULL);
@@ -1534,7 +1537,6 @@ static void at_creg_set_cb(gboolean ok,
break;
case OFONO_VENDOR_NOKIA:
case OFONO_VENDOR_SAMSUNG:
- case OFONO_VENDOR_SIMCOM:
/* Signal strength reporting via CIND is not supported */
break;
default:
--- /dev/null 2013-01-28 10:34:59.843091650 +0100
+++ ofono-1.12/plugins/simcom.c 2013-02-15 16:16:38.058552544 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,401 @@
+/*
+ *
+ * oFono - Open Source Telephony
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2008-2011 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+ * GNU General Public License for more details.
+ *
+ * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+ * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
+ * Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
+ *
+ */
+
+#ifdef HAVE_CONFIG_H
+#include <config.h>
+#endif
+
+#include <errno.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+
+#include <glib.h>
+#include <gatchat.h>
+#include <gattty.h>
+
+#define OFONO_API_SUBJECT_TO_CHANGE
+#include <ofono/plugin.h>
+#include <ofono/modem.h>
+#include <ofono/devinfo.h>
+#include <ofono/netreg.h>
+#include <ofono/sim.h>
+#include <ofono/cbs.h>
+#include <ofono/sms.h>
+#include <ofono/ussd.h>
+#include <ofono/gprs.h>
+#include <ofono/gprs-context.h>
+#include <ofono/radio-settings.h>
+#include <ofono/phonebook.h>
+#include <ofono/log.h>
+
+#include <drivers/atmodem/atutil.h>
+#include <drivers/atmodem/vendor.h>
+
+#define MAX_IGNITION_POOL_CALL 7
+
+#define CMEERR_SIMBUSY 14
+
+static const char *none_prefix[] = { NULL };
+
+struct simcom_data {
+ GAtChat *modem;
+ GAtChat *data;
+ guint ignition_pool;
+ unsigned int ignition_pool_call;
+ unsigned int at_ignition_pending;
+ ofono_bool_t have_sim;
+};
+
+/* Callback and helpers functions */
+static void simcom_debug(const char *str, void *user_data)
+{
+ const char *prefix = user_data;
+
+ ofono_info("%s%s", prefix, str);
+}
+
+static gboolean simcom_ignition(gpointer user_data)
+{
+ struct ofono_modem *modem = user_data;
+ struct simcom_data *data = ofono_modem_get_data(modem);
+
+ ++data->ignition_pool_call;
+
+ if(data->at_ignition_pending > 0)
+ {
+ if(data->ignition_pool_call > MAX_IGNITION_POOL_CALL)
+ {
+ ofono_error("Ignition timeout");
+ return FALSE;
+ }
+
+ /* Waiting reply of AT commands */
+ DBG("Waiting AT reply...");
+ return TRUE;
+ }
+
+ ofono_modem_set_powered(modem, TRUE);
+
+ return FALSE;
+}
+
+static void simcom_sim_status(gboolean ok, GAtResult *result, gpointer user_data)
+{
+ struct ofono_modem *modem = user_data;
+ struct ofono_error error;
+ struct simcom_data *data = ofono_modem_get_data(modem);
+
+ --data->at_ignition_pending;
+
+ if(!ok)
+ {
+ decode_at_error(&error, g_at_result_final_response(result));
+ if(error.type == OFONO_ERROR_TYPE_CME)
+ {
+ if(error.error == CMEERR_SIMBUSY)
+ {
+ DBG("System is busy. Retry...");
+ g_at_chat_send(data->data, "AT+CPIN?",
+ none_prefix,
+ simcom_sim_status, modem,
+ NULL);
+ ++data->at_ignition_pending;
+ return;
+ }
+ }
+
+ data->have_sim = FALSE;
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /* If doesn't have an "fatal" error on AT+CPIN request,
+ * we can guess there a SIM card ...
+ */
+ data->have_sim = TRUE;
+}
+
+static void cfun_enable(gboolean ok, GAtResult *result, gpointer user_data)
+{
+ struct ofono_modem *modem = user_data;
+ struct simcom_data *data = ofono_modem_get_data(modem);
+
+ DBG("");
+
+ if (!ok) {
+ g_at_chat_unref(data->modem);
+ data->modem = NULL;
+
+ g_at_chat_unref(data->data);
+ data->data = NULL;
+
+ ofono_modem_set_powered(modem, FALSE);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /* Get model and sim card status */
+ data->at_ignition_pending = 0;
+
+ g_at_chat_send(data->data, "AT+CPIN?", none_prefix,
+ simcom_sim_status, modem, NULL);
+ ++data->at_ignition_pending;
+
+ data->ignition_pool = g_timeout_add_seconds(1,
+ simcom_ignition,
+ modem);
+}
+
+static void cfun_disable(gboolean ok, GAtResult *result, gpointer user_data)
+{
+ struct ofono_modem *modem = user_data;
+ struct simcom_data *data = ofono_modem_get_data(modem);
+
+ DBG("");
+
+ g_at_chat_unref(data->data);
+ data->data = NULL;
+
+ if (ok)
+ ofono_modem_set_powered(modem, FALSE);
+}
+
+static GAtChat *open_device(struct ofono_modem *modem,
+ const char *key,
+ char *debug)
+{
+ const char *device;
+ GIOChannel *channel;
+ GAtSyntax *syntax;
+ GAtChat *chat;
+ /* GHashTable *options; */
+
+ device = ofono_modem_get_string(modem, key);
+ if (device == NULL)
+ {
+ ofono_error("Failed to get modem '%s'", key);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ DBG("%s %s", key, device);
+
+ /* options = g_hash_table_new(g_str_hash, g_str_equal); */
+ /* if (options == NULL) */
+ /* return NULL; */
+
+ /* g_hash_table_insert(options, "Baud", "115200"); */
+ /* g_hash_table_insert(options, "Parity", "none"); */
+ /* g_hash_table_insert(options, "StopBits", "1"); */
+ /* g_hash_table_insert(options, "DataBits", "8"); */
+ /* g_hash_table_insert(options, "XonXoff", "off"); */
+ /* g_hash_table_insert(options, "RtsCts", "on"); */
+ /* g_hash_table_insert(options, "Local", "on"); */
+ /* g_hash_table_insert(options, "Read", "on"); */
+
+ channel = g_at_tty_open(device, NULL);
+
+ /* g_hash_table_destroy(options); */
+
+ if (channel == NULL)
+ {
+ ofono_error("Failed to get tty for '%s'", key);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ syntax = g_at_syntax_new_gsm_permissive();
+ chat = g_at_chat_new(channel, syntax);
+ g_at_syntax_unref(syntax);
+
+ g_io_channel_unref(channel);
+
+ if (chat == NULL)
+ {
+ ofono_error("Failed to get chat for '%s'", key);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ //if (getenv("OFONO_AT_DEBUG"))
+ g_at_chat_set_debug(chat, simcom_debug, debug);
+
+ return chat;
+}
+
+/* Modem interface function */
+static int simcom_probe(struct ofono_modem *modem)
+{
+ struct simcom_data *data;
+
+ DBG("%p", modem);
+
+ data = g_try_new0(struct simcom_data, 1);
+ if (data == NULL)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ ofono_modem_set_data(modem, data);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void simcom_remove(struct ofono_modem *modem)
+{
+ struct simcom_data *data = ofono_modem_get_data(modem);
+
+ DBG("%p", modem);
+
+ if(data->ignition_pool > 0)
+ {
+ g_source_remove(data->ignition_pool);
+ data->ignition_pool = 0;
+ }
+
+ ofono_modem_set_data(modem, NULL);
+
+ /* Cleanup after hot-unplug */
+ g_at_chat_unref(data->data);
+
+ g_free(data);
+}
+
+static int simcom_enable(struct ofono_modem *modem)
+{
+ struct simcom_data *data = ofono_modem_get_data(modem);
+
+ DBG("%p", modem);
+
+ data->modem = open_device(modem, "Modem", "Modem: ");
+ if (data->modem == NULL)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ data->data = open_device(modem, "Data", "Data: ");
+ if (data->data == NULL) {
+ g_at_chat_unref(data->modem);
+ data->modem = NULL;
+ return -EIO;
+ }
+
+ g_at_chat_set_slave(data->modem, data->data);
+
+ g_at_chat_blacklist_terminator(data->data,
+ G_AT_CHAT_TERMINATOR_NO_CARRIER);
+
+ /* init modem */
+ g_at_chat_send(data->modem, "ATE0 +CMEE=1", NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL);
+ g_at_chat_send(data->data, "ATE0 +CMEE=1", NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL);
+
+ g_at_chat_send(data->data, "AT+CFUN=1", none_prefix,
+ cfun_enable, modem, NULL);
+
+ return -EINPROGRESS;
+}
+
+static int simcom_disable(struct ofono_modem *modem)
+{
+ struct simcom_data *data = ofono_modem_get_data(modem);
+
+ DBG("%p", modem);
+
+ g_at_chat_cancel_all(data->modem);
+ g_at_chat_unregister_all(data->modem);
+
+ g_at_chat_unref(data->modem);
+ data->modem = NULL;
+
+ g_at_chat_cancel_all(data->data);
+ g_at_chat_unregister_all(data->data);
+
+ g_at_chat_send(data->data, "AT+CFUN=4", none_prefix,
+ cfun_disable, modem, NULL);
+
+ return -EINPROGRESS;
+}
+
+static void simcom_pre_sim(struct ofono_modem *modem)
+{
+ struct simcom_data *data = ofono_modem_get_data(modem);
+ struct ofono_sim *sim;
+
+ DBG("%p", modem);
+
+ ofono_devinfo_create(modem, 0, "atmodem", data->data);
+ sim = ofono_sim_create(modem, OFONO_VENDOR_SIMCOM, "atmodem",
+ data->data);
+
+ if (sim)
+ ofono_sim_inserted_notify(sim, data->have_sim);
+}
+
+static void simcom_post_sim(struct ofono_modem *modem)
+{
+ struct simcom_data *data = ofono_modem_get_data(modem);
+ struct ofono_message_waiting *mw;
+ struct ofono_gprs *gprs;
+ struct ofono_gprs_context *gc;
+
+ DBG("%p", modem);
+
+ ofono_phonebook_create(modem, 0, "atmodem", data->data);
+
+ ofono_sms_create(modem, OFONO_VENDOR_SIMCOM, "atmodem",
+ data->data);
+
+ /* gprs things */
+ gprs = ofono_gprs_create(modem, 0, "atmodem", data->data);
+ gc = ofono_gprs_context_create(modem, 0, "atmodem", data->modem);
+
+ if(gprs && gc)
+ {
+ ofono_gprs_add_context(gprs, gc);
+ }
+}
+
+static void simcom_post_online(struct ofono_modem *modem)
+{
+ struct simcom_data *data = ofono_modem_get_data(modem);
+
+ DBG("%p", modem);
+
+ ofono_netreg_create(modem, OFONO_VENDOR_SIMCOM, "atmodem", data->data);
+ ofono_cbs_create(modem, 0, "atmodem", data->data);
+ ofono_ussd_create(modem, 0, "atmodem", data->data);
+}
+
+static struct ofono_modem_driver simcom_driver = {
+ .name = "simcom",
+ .probe = simcom_probe,
+ .remove = simcom_remove,
+ .enable = simcom_enable,
+ .disable = simcom_disable,
+ .pre_sim = simcom_pre_sim,
+ .post_sim = simcom_post_sim,
+ .post_online = simcom_post_online,
+};
+
+static int simcom_init(void)
+{
+ return ofono_modem_driver_register(&simcom_driver);
+}
+
+static void simcom_exit(void)
+{
+ ofono_modem_driver_unregister(&simcom_driver);
+}
+
+OFONO_PLUGIN_DEFINE(simcom, "SIMCOM modem driver", VERSION,
+ OFONO_PLUGIN_PRIORITY_DEFAULT,
+ simcom_init, simcom_exit)
6 days, 3 hours
IPV6 question
by Enrico Sau
Hi all,
As far as I understand, ofono doen't support IPV6 over ppp due to the fact
that IPV6 compression protocol implementation is missing.
Is that right?
Thank you,
Enrico
4 weeks
Business
by Daser Jnr.
Hi all
>From a business point of view, can some one tell me what i can do with ofono
Cheers
Daser S.
4 months
ofono with sim5320 module
by David Ashley
Hello, I'm at my wits' end trying to get ofono working with the
sim5320 module. I'm using the plugins/sim900.c module as a starting
point. I think the issue has something to do with the difference
between the MUX functionality between the 900 and the 5320. The sim900
supports the elaborate parameters sent on the
AT+CMUX=0,x,x,x,x, etc.
but the SIM5320 only supports
AT+CMUX=0
There's that... but also the way the sim900 plugin creates a
SETUP_DLC, initiates muxing, then deletes the setup DLC and creates 4
new DLC's... it didn't work for the sim5320 until I remapped the DLC's
somewhat like this:
#define NUM_DLC 4
#define VOICE_DLC 2
#define NETREG_DLC 1
//#define SMS_DLC 2
#define GPRS_DLC 3
#define SETUP_DLC 0
static char *dlc_prefixes[NUM_DLC] = {
[VOICE_DLC]="Voice: ",
[NETREG_DLC]="Net: ",
// [SMS_DLC]= "SMS: ",
[GPRS_DLC]= "GPRS: " ,
[SETUP_DLC]= "Setup: ",
};
Note I have to eliminate the SMS_DLC usage later in sim5320_post_sim:
// ofono_sms_create(modem, OFONO_VENDOR_SIMCOM, "atmodem",
// data->dlcs[SMS_DLC]);
OK everything is *ALMOST* working. ofonod interacts fine with
connmand, connmand tells ofonod to activate the sim5320, which
actually establishes a ppp connection and sets up a ppp device:
ppp0 Link encap:UNSPEC HWaddr 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-0
inet addr:30.97.132.47 P-t-P:30.97.132.47 Mask:255.255.255.255
UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:2 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:500
RX bytes:0 (0.0 B) TX bytes:124 (124.0 B)
Here's the rub: No matter what I do, I never get any RX packets from
that ppp device, and even when it appears to TX packets (I'm trying to
ping out) the machine on the internet isn't actually receiving them.
I'm running on a beaglebone with a custom board with a sim5320 module on it.
I have no idea what to try... Any advice would be appreciated...
Thanks very much!!!!
-Dave
4 years, 6 months
[PATCH v3 0/7] ubloxmodem add netmon interface
by Djalal Harouni
Hi,
These patches add netmon interface to ubloxmodem. This allows to query
and get data returned by +CESQ command through D-Bus.
The following types will be exposed as Network Monitor Property Types.
RSCP: Received Signal Code Power
ECN0: Received Energy Ratio
RSRQ: Reference Signal Received Quality
RSRP: Reference Signal Received Power
Thank you!
Changes since v2
* Fixed subject of header message: we have 0/7 patches and not 0/5
* Tag all subject of patches with v3, easy to read.
* Fixed a bug we have to return when finishing please see:
https://lists.ofono.org/pipermail/ofono/2016-November/016693.html
Changes since v1:
* Re-worked patches to follow 'Submitting patches' section.
Each top-level directory change should be in a separate patch
* Removed OFONO_NETMON_INFO_OPERATOR
* Documented all added fields in networkmonitor-api.txt
* We only use one channel for communication, dropped the other one.
* Fixed a cbd memory leak, now we try to be conservative and always
report what we have collected so far. We only fail hard in case
+COPS failed or sending +CESQ failed. Otherwise we report the result
and make sure to free cbd.
* Various fixes to follow the coding style.
v2 is here:
https://lists.ofono.org/pipermail/ofono/2016-November/016685.html
V1 is here:
https://lists.ofono.org/pipermail/ofono/2016-November/016671.html
Djalal Harouni (7):
netmon: add OFONO_NETMON_INFO_{RSCP|ECN0|RSRQ|RSRP}
netmon: handle OFONO_NETMON_INFO_{RSCP|ECN0|RSRQ|RSRP} in D-Bus
doc: documentation for OFONO_NETMON_INFO_{RSCP|ECN0|RSRQ|RSRP}
ubloxmodem: add the netmon driver
ubloxmodem: register and initialize the netmon driver
build: build the ublox netmon driver
test: support OFONO_NETMON_INFO_{RXLEV|RSCP|ECN0|RSRQ|RSRP}
Makefile.am | 1 +
doc/networkmonitor-api.txt | 22 +++
drivers/ubloxmodem/netmon.c | 335 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/ubloxmodem/ubloxmodem.c | 2 +
drivers/ubloxmodem/ubloxmodem.h | 3 +
include/netmon.h | 4 +
plugins/ublox.c | 3 +
src/netmon.c | 28 ++++
test/get-serving-cell-info | 20 +++
9 files changed, 418 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/ubloxmodem/netmon.c
5 years, 6 months
[PATCH v2 0/5] ubloxmodem add netmon interface
by Djalal Harouni
Hi,
These patches add netmon interface to ubloxmodem. This allows to query
and get data returned by +CESQ command through D-Bus.
The following types will be exposed as Network Monitor Property Types.
RSCP: Received Signal Code Power
ECN0: Received Energy Ratio
RSRQ: Reference Signal Received Quality
RSRP: Reference Signal Received Power
V1 is here:
https://lists.ofono.org/pipermail/ofono/2016-November/016671.html
Thank you!
Changes since v1:
* Re-worked patches to follow 'Submitting patches' section.
Each top-level directory change should be in a separate patch
* Removed OFONO_NETMON_INFO_OPERATOR
* Documented all added fields in networkmonitor-api.txt
* We only use one channel for communication, dropped the other one.
* Fixed a cbd memory leak, now we try to be conservative and always
report what we have collected so far. We only fail hard in case
+COPS failed or sending +CESQ failed. Otherwise we report the result
and make sure to free cbd.
* Various fixes to follow the coding style.
Djalal Harouni (7):
netmon: add OFONO_NETMON_INFO_{RSCP|ECN0|RSRQ|RSRP}
netmon: handle OFONO_NETMON_INFO_{RSCP|ECN0|RSRQ|RSRP} in D-Bus
doc: documentation for OFONO_NETMON_INFO_{RSCP|ECN0|RSRQ|RSRP}
ubloxmodem: add the netmon driver
ubloxmodem: register and initialize the netmon driver
build: build the ublox netmon driver
test: support OFONO_NETMON_INFO_{RXLEV|RSCP|ECN0|RSRQ|RSRP}
Makefile.am | 1 +
doc/networkmonitor-api.txt | 22 +++
drivers/ubloxmodem/netmon.c | 335 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/ubloxmodem/ubloxmodem.c | 2 +
drivers/ubloxmodem/ubloxmodem.h | 3 +
include/netmon.h | 4 +
plugins/ublox.c | 3 +
src/netmon.c | 28 ++++
test/get-serving-cell-info | 20 +++
9 files changed, 418 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/ubloxmodem/netmon.c
5 years, 7 months
[PATCH 0/5] RFC: ubloxmodem add netmon interface
by djalal＠endocode.com
From: Djalal Harouni <djalal(a)endocode.com>
Hi,
These patches add netmon interface to ubloxmodem. This allows to query
and get data returned by +CESQ command through D-Bus.
The following types will be exposed as Network Monitor Property Types.
RSCP: Received Signal Code Power
ECN0: Received Energy Ratio
RSRQ: Reference Signal Received Quality
RSRP: Reference Signal Received Power
OPERATOR: the operator
The 5 patches are:
0001: add the ofono netmon types that we are interesting in
OFONO_NETMON_INFO_{RSCP|ECN0|RSRQ|RSRP|OPERATOR}
These will be collected from +COPS and +CESQ
0002: handle OFONO_NETMON_INFO_{RSCP|ECN0|RSRQ|RSRP|OPERATOR} in D-Bus
0003: ubloxmodem: add the netmon driver
This adds the actual netmon driver. It also contains the code to
do +COPS and +CESQ and send back result.
0004: ubloxmodem: intialize and register the netmon driver
This adds the code to intialize and register the driver that was
added in patch 0003
0005: test: support OFONO_NETMON_INFO_{RSCP|ECN0|RSRQ|RSRP|OPERATOR}
This makes get-serving-cell-info script return the all data that
we did expose.
Questions:
How we should document these new fields in doc/networkmonitor-api.txt ?
Should we use the official values from the ublox AT manual ?
Thank you!
Djalal Harouni (5):
netmon: add OFONO_NETMON_INFO_{RSCP|ECN0|RSRQ|RSRP|OPERATOR}
netmon: handle OFONO_NETMON_INFO_{RSCP|ECN0|RSRQ|RSRP|OPERATOR} in D-Bus
ubloxmodem: add the netmon driver
ubloxmodem: intialize and register the netmon driver
test: support OFONO_NETMON_INFO_{RSCP|ECN0|RSRQ|RSRP|OPERATOR}
Makefile.am | 1 +
drivers/ubloxmodem/netmon.c | 339 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/ubloxmodem/ubloxmodem.c | 2 +
drivers/ubloxmodem/ubloxmodem.h | 3 ++
include/netmon.h | 5 ++
plugins/ublox.c | 3 ++
src/netmon.c | 40 +++++++++++++++-
test/get-serving-cell-info | 24 ++++++++++
8 files changed, 416 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/ubloxmodem/netmon.c
--
2.5.5
5 years, 7 months
[PATCH] gprs: lte: set attached after successful activation
by Dragos Tatulea
Otherwise the attached state gets to be set before the actual LTE
automatic context is ready. This triggers a race between connman
and ofono: connman sees status attached before the context is active
so connman will try to activate another context with same apn and will
fail over and over again.
---
src/gprs.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/gprs.c b/src/gprs.c
index 5f7620b..5015a2f 100644
--- a/src/gprs.c
+++ b/src/gprs.c
@@ -959,6 +959,24 @@ static void pri_deactivate_callback(const struct ofono_error *error, void *data)
}
}
+static void gprs_set_attached_property(struct ofono_gprs *gprs,
+ ofono_bool_t attached)
+{
+ const char *path;
+ DBusConnection *conn = ofono_dbus_get_connection();
+ dbus_bool_t value = attached;
+
+ if (gprs->attached == attached)
+ return;
+
+ gprs->attached = attached;
+
+ path = __ofono_atom_get_path(gprs->atom);
+ ofono_dbus_signal_property_changed(conn, path,
+ OFONO_CONNECTION_MANAGER_INTERFACE,
+ "Attached", DBUS_TYPE_BOOLEAN, &value);
+}
+
static void pri_read_settings_callback(const struct ofono_error *error,
void *data)
{
@@ -987,6 +1005,9 @@ static void pri_read_settings_callback(const struct ofono_error *error,
}
value = pri_ctx->active;
+
+ gprs_set_attached_property(pri_ctx->gprs, TRUE);
+
ofono_dbus_signal_property_changed(conn, pri_ctx->path,
OFONO_CONNECTION_CONTEXT_INTERFACE,
"Active", DBUS_TYPE_BOOLEAN, &value);
@@ -1596,24 +1617,6 @@ static void release_active_contexts(struct ofono_gprs *gprs)
}
}
-static void gprs_set_attached_property(struct ofono_gprs *gprs,
- ofono_bool_t attached)
-{
- const char *path;
- DBusConnection *conn = ofono_dbus_get_connection();
- dbus_bool_t value = attached;
-
- if (gprs->attached == attached)
- return;
-
- gprs->attached = attached;
-
- path = __ofono_atom_get_path(gprs->atom);
- ofono_dbus_signal_property_changed(conn, path,
- OFONO_CONNECTION_MANAGER_INTERFACE,
- "Attached", DBUS_TYPE_BOOLEAN, &value);
-}
-
static void gprs_attached_update(struct ofono_gprs *gprs)
{
ofono_bool_t attached;
@@ -1717,11 +1720,12 @@ static void gprs_netreg_update(struct ofono_gprs *gprs)
DBG("attach: %u, driver_attached: %u", attach, gprs->driver_attached);
if (ofono_netreg_get_technology(gprs->netreg) ==
- ACCESS_TECHNOLOGY_EUTRAN) {
- /* Ignore attach logic for LTE. There is no such concept. */
- gprs_set_attached_property(gprs, attach);
- return;
- }
+ ACCESS_TECHNOLOGY_EUTRAN)
+ /*
+ * For LTE we set attached status only on successful
+ * context activation.
+ */
+ return;
if (gprs->driver_attached == attach)
return;
--
2.7.4
5 years, 7 months
