Re: AW: AW: AW: connmand[186]: Online check failed but running dhclient manually fixes this issue
by Daniel Wagner
Hi Vinothkumar,
[sorry for the last mails where I got your last name mixed up...]
On 08/10/2017 07:03 AM, Eswaran Vinothkumar (BEG/PJ-IOT-EL) wrote:
> Could you send me the exact modem description you are using? So that we can write quirk?
>
> Hi,
>
> I am using TELIT 910 EUG Modem.
Okay, maybe that is already enough. I saw that in drivers/telit.c there
is already some code to handle variants of the modem. The matching is
done on these strings.
Are there any vid/pid available fot his modem?
Thanks,
Daniel
1 week, 2 days
[PATCH] Simcom support
by Anthony Viallard
Add SIMCOM support.
I developped this with the SIM5216E chipset and ofono 1.12.
- SMS and GPRS work (in the same time) ;
- SIM card presence check ;
- No voice part because I can't test it ;
- Use default characters set instead GSM because it works like that
for what I'm doing (SMS+GPRS) (by default, the set is IRA for SIM5216E).
Also, the SIMCOM doc affraids me about problems when using GSM
(this setting causes easily software flow control (XON /XOFF) problems.).
Signed-off-by: Anthony Viallard <homer242 at gmail.com>
--- ofono-1.12.orig/Makefile.am 2012-04-20 21:06:29.000000000 +0200
+++ ofono-1.12/Makefile.am 2013-01-21 17:17:48.089627277 +0100
@@ -371,6 +371,9 @@ builtin_sources += plugins/samsung.c
builtin_modules += sim900
builtin_sources += plugins/sim900.c
+builtin_modules += simcom
+builtin_sources += plugins/simcom.c
+
if BLUETOOTH
builtin_modules += bluetooth
builtin_sources += plugins/bluetooth.c plugins/bluetooth.h
--- ofono-1.12.orig/drivers/atmodem/sms.c 2012-04-20 21:06:29.000000000 +0200
+++ ofono-1.12/drivers/atmodem/sms.c 2013-01-21 16:48:44.460627485 +0100
@@ -805,6 +807,7 @@ static gboolean build_cnmi_string(char *
case OFONO_VENDOR_NOVATEL:
case OFONO_VENDOR_HUAWEI:
case OFONO_VENDOR_ZTE:
+ case OFONO_VENDOR_SIMCOM:
/* MSM devices advertise support for mode 2, but return an
* error if we attempt to actually use it. */
mode = "1";
diff -pruN ofono-1.12.orig/drivers/atmodem/sim.c ofono-1.12/drivers/atmodem/sim.c
--- ofono-1.12.orig/drivers/atmodem/sim.c 2013-01-23 11:38:22.959609087 +0100
+++ ofono-1.12/drivers/atmodem/sim.c 2013-01-23 11:57:52.602608948 +0100
@@ -1023,12 +1023,18 @@ static void at_pin_send_cb(gboolean ok,
FALSE, cbd, g_free);
return;
case OFONO_VENDOR_ZTE:
case OFONO_VENDOR_ALCATEL:
case OFONO_VENDOR_HUAWEI:
+ case OFONO_VENDOR_SIMCOM:
/*
* On ZTE modems, after pin is entered, SIM state is checked
* by polling CPIN as their modem doesn't provide unsolicited
* notification of SIM readiness.
+ *
+ * On SIMCOM modems, SIM is busy after pin is entered (we've
+ * got an "+CME ERROR: 14" at "AT+CPIN?" request) and ofono
+ * don't catch the "+CPIN: READY" message sent by the modem
+ * when SIM is ready. So, use extra CPIN to check the state.
*/
sd->sim_state_query = at_util_sim_state_query_new(sd->chat,
2, 20, sim_state_cb, cbd,
diff -purN ofono-1.12/drivers/atmodem/network-registration.c ofono-patched/drivers/atmodem/network-registration.c
--- ofono-1.12/drivers/atmodem/network-registration.c 2013-01-18 15:04:03.598659165 +0100
+++ ofono-patched/drivers/atmodem/network-registration.c 2013-01-18 14:54:03.256659236 +0100
@@ -1411,6 +1411,14 @@ static void at_creg_set_cb(gboolean ok,
}
switch (nd->vendor) {
+ case OFONO_VENDOR_SIMCOM:
+ /* Register for CSQ changes */
+ g_at_chat_send(nd->chat, "AT+AUTOCSQ=1,1", none_prefix,
+ NULL, NULL, NULL);
+
+ g_at_chat_register(nd->chat, "+CSQ:",
+ csq_notify, FALSE, netreg, NULL);
+ break;
case OFONO_VENDOR_PHONESIM:
g_at_chat_register(nd->chat, "+CSQ:",
csq_notify, FALSE, netreg, NULL);
@@ -1534,7 +1537,6 @@ static void at_creg_set_cb(gboolean ok,
break;
case OFONO_VENDOR_NOKIA:
case OFONO_VENDOR_SAMSUNG:
- case OFONO_VENDOR_SIMCOM:
/* Signal strength reporting via CIND is not supported */
break;
default:
--- /dev/null 2013-01-28 10:34:59.843091650 +0100
+++ ofono-1.12/plugins/simcom.c 2013-02-15 16:16:38.058552544 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,401 @@
+/*
+ *
+ * oFono - Open Source Telephony
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2008-2011 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+ * GNU General Public License for more details.
+ *
+ * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+ * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
+ * Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
+ *
+ */
+
+#ifdef HAVE_CONFIG_H
+#include <config.h>
+#endif
+
+#include <errno.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+
+#include <glib.h>
+#include <gatchat.h>
+#include <gattty.h>
+
+#define OFONO_API_SUBJECT_TO_CHANGE
+#include <ofono/plugin.h>
+#include <ofono/modem.h>
+#include <ofono/devinfo.h>
+#include <ofono/netreg.h>
+#include <ofono/sim.h>
+#include <ofono/cbs.h>
+#include <ofono/sms.h>
+#include <ofono/ussd.h>
+#include <ofono/gprs.h>
+#include <ofono/gprs-context.h>
+#include <ofono/radio-settings.h>
+#include <ofono/phonebook.h>
+#include <ofono/log.h>
+
+#include <drivers/atmodem/atutil.h>
+#include <drivers/atmodem/vendor.h>
+
+#define MAX_IGNITION_POOL_CALL 7
+
+#define CMEERR_SIMBUSY 14
+
+static const char *none_prefix[] = { NULL };
+
+struct simcom_data {
+ GAtChat *modem;
+ GAtChat *data;
+ guint ignition_pool;
+ unsigned int ignition_pool_call;
+ unsigned int at_ignition_pending;
+ ofono_bool_t have_sim;
+};
+
+/* Callback and helpers functions */
+static void simcom_debug(const char *str, void *user_data)
+{
+ const char *prefix = user_data;
+
+ ofono_info("%s%s", prefix, str);
+}
+
+static gboolean simcom_ignition(gpointer user_data)
+{
+ struct ofono_modem *modem = user_data;
+ struct simcom_data *data = ofono_modem_get_data(modem);
+
+ ++data->ignition_pool_call;
+
+ if(data->at_ignition_pending > 0)
+ {
+ if(data->ignition_pool_call > MAX_IGNITION_POOL_CALL)
+ {
+ ofono_error("Ignition timeout");
+ return FALSE;
+ }
+
+ /* Waiting reply of AT commands */
+ DBG("Waiting AT reply...");
+ return TRUE;
+ }
+
+ ofono_modem_set_powered(modem, TRUE);
+
+ return FALSE;
+}
+
+static void simcom_sim_status(gboolean ok, GAtResult *result, gpointer user_data)
+{
+ struct ofono_modem *modem = user_data;
+ struct ofono_error error;
+ struct simcom_data *data = ofono_modem_get_data(modem);
+
+ --data->at_ignition_pending;
+
+ if(!ok)
+ {
+ decode_at_error(&error, g_at_result_final_response(result));
+ if(error.type == OFONO_ERROR_TYPE_CME)
+ {
+ if(error.error == CMEERR_SIMBUSY)
+ {
+ DBG("System is busy. Retry...");
+ g_at_chat_send(data->data, "AT+CPIN?",
+ none_prefix,
+ simcom_sim_status, modem,
+ NULL);
+ ++data->at_ignition_pending;
+ return;
+ }
+ }
+
+ data->have_sim = FALSE;
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /* If doesn't have an "fatal" error on AT+CPIN request,
+ * we can guess there a SIM card ...
+ */
+ data->have_sim = TRUE;
+}
+
+static void cfun_enable(gboolean ok, GAtResult *result, gpointer user_data)
+{
+ struct ofono_modem *modem = user_data;
+ struct simcom_data *data = ofono_modem_get_data(modem);
+
+ DBG("");
+
+ if (!ok) {
+ g_at_chat_unref(data->modem);
+ data->modem = NULL;
+
+ g_at_chat_unref(data->data);
+ data->data = NULL;
+
+ ofono_modem_set_powered(modem, FALSE);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /* Get model and sim card status */
+ data->at_ignition_pending = 0;
+
+ g_at_chat_send(data->data, "AT+CPIN?", none_prefix,
+ simcom_sim_status, modem, NULL);
+ ++data->at_ignition_pending;
+
+ data->ignition_pool = g_timeout_add_seconds(1,
+ simcom_ignition,
+ modem);
+}
+
+static void cfun_disable(gboolean ok, GAtResult *result, gpointer user_data)
+{
+ struct ofono_modem *modem = user_data;
+ struct simcom_data *data = ofono_modem_get_data(modem);
+
+ DBG("");
+
+ g_at_chat_unref(data->data);
+ data->data = NULL;
+
+ if (ok)
+ ofono_modem_set_powered(modem, FALSE);
+}
+
+static GAtChat *open_device(struct ofono_modem *modem,
+ const char *key,
+ char *debug)
+{
+ const char *device;
+ GIOChannel *channel;
+ GAtSyntax *syntax;
+ GAtChat *chat;
+ /* GHashTable *options; */
+
+ device = ofono_modem_get_string(modem, key);
+ if (device == NULL)
+ {
+ ofono_error("Failed to get modem '%s'", key);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ DBG("%s %s", key, device);
+
+ /* options = g_hash_table_new(g_str_hash, g_str_equal); */
+ /* if (options == NULL) */
+ /* return NULL; */
+
+ /* g_hash_table_insert(options, "Baud", "115200"); */
+ /* g_hash_table_insert(options, "Parity", "none"); */
+ /* g_hash_table_insert(options, "StopBits", "1"); */
+ /* g_hash_table_insert(options, "DataBits", "8"); */
+ /* g_hash_table_insert(options, "XonXoff", "off"); */
+ /* g_hash_table_insert(options, "RtsCts", "on"); */
+ /* g_hash_table_insert(options, "Local", "on"); */
+ /* g_hash_table_insert(options, "Read", "on"); */
+
+ channel = g_at_tty_open(device, NULL);
+
+ /* g_hash_table_destroy(options); */
+
+ if (channel == NULL)
+ {
+ ofono_error("Failed to get tty for '%s'", key);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ syntax = g_at_syntax_new_gsm_permissive();
+ chat = g_at_chat_new(channel, syntax);
+ g_at_syntax_unref(syntax);
+
+ g_io_channel_unref(channel);
+
+ if (chat == NULL)
+ {
+ ofono_error("Failed to get chat for '%s'", key);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ //if (getenv("OFONO_AT_DEBUG"))
+ g_at_chat_set_debug(chat, simcom_debug, debug);
+
+ return chat;
+}
+
+/* Modem interface function */
+static int simcom_probe(struct ofono_modem *modem)
+{
+ struct simcom_data *data;
+
+ DBG("%p", modem);
+
+ data = g_try_new0(struct simcom_data, 1);
+ if (data == NULL)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ ofono_modem_set_data(modem, data);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void simcom_remove(struct ofono_modem *modem)
+{
+ struct simcom_data *data = ofono_modem_get_data(modem);
+
+ DBG("%p", modem);
+
+ if(data->ignition_pool > 0)
+ {
+ g_source_remove(data->ignition_pool);
+ data->ignition_pool = 0;
+ }
+
+ ofono_modem_set_data(modem, NULL);
+
+ /* Cleanup after hot-unplug */
+ g_at_chat_unref(data->data);
+
+ g_free(data);
+}
+
+static int simcom_enable(struct ofono_modem *modem)
+{
+ struct simcom_data *data = ofono_modem_get_data(modem);
+
+ DBG("%p", modem);
+
+ data->modem = open_device(modem, "Modem", "Modem: ");
+ if (data->modem == NULL)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ data->data = open_device(modem, "Data", "Data: ");
+ if (data->data == NULL) {
+ g_at_chat_unref(data->modem);
+ data->modem = NULL;
+ return -EIO;
+ }
+
+ g_at_chat_set_slave(data->modem, data->data);
+
+ g_at_chat_blacklist_terminator(data->data,
+ G_AT_CHAT_TERMINATOR_NO_CARRIER);
+
+ /* init modem */
+ g_at_chat_send(data->modem, "ATE0 +CMEE=1", NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL);
+ g_at_chat_send(data->data, "ATE0 +CMEE=1", NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL);
+
+ g_at_chat_send(data->data, "AT+CFUN=1", none_prefix,
+ cfun_enable, modem, NULL);
+
+ return -EINPROGRESS;
+}
+
+static int simcom_disable(struct ofono_modem *modem)
+{
+ struct simcom_data *data = ofono_modem_get_data(modem);
+
+ DBG("%p", modem);
+
+ g_at_chat_cancel_all(data->modem);
+ g_at_chat_unregister_all(data->modem);
+
+ g_at_chat_unref(data->modem);
+ data->modem = NULL;
+
+ g_at_chat_cancel_all(data->data);
+ g_at_chat_unregister_all(data->data);
+
+ g_at_chat_send(data->data, "AT+CFUN=4", none_prefix,
+ cfun_disable, modem, NULL);
+
+ return -EINPROGRESS;
+}
+
+static void simcom_pre_sim(struct ofono_modem *modem)
+{
+ struct simcom_data *data = ofono_modem_get_data(modem);
+ struct ofono_sim *sim;
+
+ DBG("%p", modem);
+
+ ofono_devinfo_create(modem, 0, "atmodem", data->data);
+ sim = ofono_sim_create(modem, OFONO_VENDOR_SIMCOM, "atmodem",
+ data->data);
+
+ if (sim)
+ ofono_sim_inserted_notify(sim, data->have_sim);
+}
+
+static void simcom_post_sim(struct ofono_modem *modem)
+{
+ struct simcom_data *data = ofono_modem_get_data(modem);
+ struct ofono_message_waiting *mw;
+ struct ofono_gprs *gprs;
+ struct ofono_gprs_context *gc;
+
+ DBG("%p", modem);
+
+ ofono_phonebook_create(modem, 0, "atmodem", data->data);
+
+ ofono_sms_create(modem, OFONO_VENDOR_SIMCOM, "atmodem",
+ data->data);
+
+ /* gprs things */
+ gprs = ofono_gprs_create(modem, 0, "atmodem", data->data);
+ gc = ofono_gprs_context_create(modem, 0, "atmodem", data->modem);
+
+ if(gprs && gc)
+ {
+ ofono_gprs_add_context(gprs, gc);
+ }
+}
+
+static void simcom_post_online(struct ofono_modem *modem)
+{
+ struct simcom_data *data = ofono_modem_get_data(modem);
+
+ DBG("%p", modem);
+
+ ofono_netreg_create(modem, OFONO_VENDOR_SIMCOM, "atmodem", data->data);
+ ofono_cbs_create(modem, 0, "atmodem", data->data);
+ ofono_ussd_create(modem, 0, "atmodem", data->data);
+}
+
+static struct ofono_modem_driver simcom_driver = {
+ .name = "simcom",
+ .probe = simcom_probe,
+ .remove = simcom_remove,
+ .enable = simcom_enable,
+ .disable = simcom_disable,
+ .pre_sim = simcom_pre_sim,
+ .post_sim = simcom_post_sim,
+ .post_online = simcom_post_online,
+};
+
+static int simcom_init(void)
+{
+ return ofono_modem_driver_register(&simcom_driver);
+}
+
+static void simcom_exit(void)
+{
+ ofono_modem_driver_unregister(&simcom_driver);
+}
+
+OFONO_PLUGIN_DEFINE(simcom, "SIMCOM modem driver", VERSION,
+ OFONO_PLUGIN_PRIORITY_DEFAULT,
+ simcom_init, simcom_exit)
2 weeks, 5 days
[PATCH_v4 0/5] Private network request to ConnMan
by Guillaume Zajac
Hi,
Changelog from v3 is:
- Add private-network source/include
- ConnMan plugin is independant from emulator
- Each application that need VPN will pass a callback as argument
when private network is requested. This callback will contain the
private network settings.
Guillaume Zajac (5):
gatppp: Add new contructor to use external fd
private-network: add callback typedef drivers and settings
private-network: add request/release functions and new feature to
Makefile.am
emulator: add request/release private network calls
connman: add plugin in oFono to request request/release private
network
Makefile.am | 10 +-
gatchat/gatppp.c | 33 +++++-
gatchat/gatppp.h | 1 +
gatchat/ppp.h | 2 +-
gatchat/ppp_net.c | 40 ++++---
include/private-network.h | 59 +++++++++
plugins/connman.c | 297 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
src/emulator.c | 49 ++++++--
src/ofono.h | 6 +
src/private-network.c | 89 ++++++++++++++
10 files changed, 556 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 include/private-network.h
create mode 100644 plugins/connman.c
create mode 100644 src/private-network.c
3 weeks
Business
by Daser Jnr.
Hi all
>From a business point of view, can some one tell me what i can do with ofono
Cheers
Daser S.
2 months, 2 weeks
IPV6 question
by Enrico Sau
Hi all,
As far as I understand, ofono doen't support IPV6 over ppp due to the fact
that IPV6 compression protocol implementation is missing.
Is that right?
Thank you,
Enrico
2 months, 4 weeks
[PATCH] qmimodem: fix roaming status report
by Christophe Ronco
Hi,
With a MC7304 modem and a roaming SIM card, Status in org.ofono.NetworkRegistration
properties ends up in "registered" instead of roaming.
Both AT command and qmicli indicates we are roaming.
What's happening is the following:
1) first QMI_NAS_SS_INFO_IND indicating we are registered contains a QMI_NAS_RESULT_ROAMING_STATUS parameter.
Parameter inside says we are roaming and qmimidem driver correctly reports status NETWORK_REGISTRATION_STATUS_ROAMING.
2) other QMI_NAS_SS_INFO_IND arrive, saying we are registered without QMI_NAS_RESULT_ROAMING_STATUS parameter.
Driver reports NETWORK_REGISTRATION_STATUS_REGISTERED.
Extract of traces with QMI binary debug interpreted (as far as I can...):
a) first "searching" indication
Dec 13 13:19:40 klk-lpbs-0504B4 daemon.info ofonod[855]: QMI: < 01 3b 00 80 03 01 04 00 00 24 00 2f 00
29 05 00 d0 00 14 00 00 MCC:208 MNC:20
22 05 00 01 02 00 01 00 Detailed Service Status: QMI_NAS_SERVICE_STATUS_LIMITED, QMI_NAS_NETWORK_SERVICE_DOMAIN_PS, ...
15 03 00 01 08 01 LTE, no roaming
12 05 00 d0 00 14 00 00 Current PLMN: MCC:208 MNC:20, no desc
11 01 00 00
10 01 00 01 No roaming
01 06 00 02 02 02 02 01 08 QMI_NAS_REGISTRATION_STATE_NOT_REGISTERED_SEARCHING, CS detached, PS detached, NETWORK_TYPE_3GPP, QMI_NAS_RADIO_INTERFACE_LTE
Dec 13 13:19:40 klk-lpbs-0504B4 daemon.info ofonod[855]: QMI: NAS_ind msg=36 len=47 [client=1,type=4,tid=0,len=59]
Dec 13 13:19:40 klk-lpbs-0504B4 daemon.info ofonod[855]: QMI: {type=41,len=5} {type=34,len=5} {type=21,len=3} {type=18,len=5}
Dec 13 13:19:40 klk-lpbs-0504B4 daemon.info ofonod[855]: QMI: {type=17,len=1} {type=16,len=1} {type=1,len=6}
Dec 13 13:19:40 klk-lpbs-0504B4 daemon.debug ofonod[855]: ofono_netreg_status_notify modem /sierra_0 status 2 lac -1 cellid -1 tech 7
b) second "searching" indication
Dec 13 13:19:41 klk-lpbs-0504B4 daemon.info ofonod[855]: QMI: < 01 21 00 80 03 01 04 00 00 24 00 15 00
22 05 00 03 03 00 01 00 Detailed Service Status: QMI_NAS_SERVICE_STATUS_LIMITED_REGIONAL, CS_PS, ...
11 01 00 00
01 06 00 02 02 02 02 01 08 QMI_NAS_REGISTRATION_STATE_NOT_REGISTERED_SEARCHING, CS detached, PS detached, NETWORK_TYPE_3GPP, QMI_NAS_RADIO_INTERFACE_LTE
Dec 13 13:19:41 klk-lpbs-0504B4 daemon.info ofonod[855]: QMI: NAS_ind msg=36 len=21 [client=1,type=4,tid=0,len=33]
Dec 13 13:19:41 klk-lpbs-0504B4 daemon.info ofonod[855]: QMI: {type=34,len=5} {type=17,len=1} {type=1,len=6}
c) First indication while "registered"
Dec 13 13:19:56 klk-lpbs-0504B4 daemon.info ofonod[855]: QMI: < 01 5e 00 80 03 01 04 00 00 24 00 52 00
2a 01 00 00
29 05 00 d0 00 14 00 00 MCC:208 MNC:20
28 02 00 15 01 UMTS Primary Scrambling Code
26 08 00 03 00 00 00 03 00 00 00 CS: all calls allowed, PS: all calls allowed
22 05 00 02 03 00 01 00 Detailed Service Status: QMI_NAS_SERVICE_STATUS_AVAILABLE, CS_PS, ...
1e 04 00 f7 00 95 04 CID 3GPP
1d 02 00 fb 50 LAC 3GPP
15 03 00 01 05 00 UMTS: roaming
12 05 00 d0 00 14 00 00 Current PLMN: MCC:208 MNC:20, no desc
11 04 00 03 03 04 05
10 01 00 00 ROAMING ON
01 06 00 01 01 01 02 01 05 QMI_NAS_REGISTRATION_STATE_REGISTERED, CS attached, PS attached, NETWORK_TYPE_3GPP, QMI_NAS_RADIO_INTERFACE_UMTS
Dec 13 13:19:56 klk-lpbs-0504B4 daemon.info ofonod[855]: QMI: NAS_ind msg=36 len=82 [client=1,type=4,tid=0,len=94]
Dec 13 13:19:56 klk-lpbs-0504B4 daemon.info ofonod[855]: QMI: {type=42,len=1} {type=41,len=5} {type=40,len=2} {type=38,len=8}
Dec 13 13:19:56 klk-lpbs-0504B4 daemon.info ofonod[855]: QMI: {type=34,len=5} {type=30,len=4} {type=29,len=2} {type=21,len=3}
Dec 13 13:19:56 klk-lpbs-0504B4 daemon.info ofonod[855]: QMI: {type=18,len=5} {type=17,len=4} {type=16,len=1} {type=1,len=6}
Dec 13 13:19:56 klk-lpbs-0504B4 daemon.debug ofonod[855]: ofono_gprs_status_notify modem /sierra_0 status 1
==================> ROAMING status reported <==========================
Dec 13 13:19:56 klk-lpbs-0504B4 daemon.debug ofonod[855]: ofono_netreg_status_notify modem /sierra_0 status 5 lac 20731 cellid 76873975 tech 2
d) second indication while "registered"
Dec 13 13:19:56 klk-lpbs-0504B4 daemon.info ofonod[855]: QMI: < 01 31 00 80 03 01 04 00 00 24 00 25 00
29 05 00 d0 00 14 00 00 MCC:208 MNC:20
28 02 00 15 01 UMTS Primary Scrambling Code
12 05 00 d0 00 14 00 00 Current PLMN: MCC:208 MNC:20, no desc
11 04 00 03 03 04 05
01 06 00 01 01 01 02 01 05 QMI_NAS_REGISTRATION_STATE_REGISTERED, CS attached, PS attached, NETWORK_TYPE_3GPP, QMI_NAS_RADIO_INTERFACE_UMTS
Dec 13 13:19:56 klk-lpbs-0504B4 daemon.info ofonod[855]: QMI: NAS_ind msg=36 len=37 [client=1,type=4,tid=0,len=49]
Dec 13 13:19:56 klk-lpbs-0504B4 daemon.info ofonod[855]: QMI: {type=41,len=5} {type=40,len=2} {type=18,len=5} {type=17,len=4}
Dec 13 13:19:56 klk-lpbs-0504B4 daemon.info ofonod[855]: QMI: {type=1,len=6}
==================> ROAMING information lost <==========================
Dec 13 13:19:56 klk-lpbs-0504B4 daemon.debug ofonod[855]: ofono_netreg_status_notify modem /sierra_0 status 1 lac -1 cellid -1 tech 2
I don't know if this is a problem specific to MC7304 or even to my firmware version or if this is a normal behavior to have ROAMING_STATUS parameter only when status change from anything to registered.
Best Regards,
Christophe
Christophe Ronco (1):
qmimodem: fix roaming status report
drivers/qmimodem/network-registration.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--
2.7.4
3 years, 8 months
no connection after ofono restart while huawei modem connected
by Christophe Ronco
Hi,
I use a Huawei MS2372h-607. It is a classical AT+PPP modem. I have a
problem when I stop ofono while context is activated. When I restart
ofono (without unplugging the modem), I am not able to send any AT
command on Modem channel because this channel is still in data mode.
I made a patch to send escape sequence when gprs-context atom is
removed. It fixes the problem but I don't know if this is the right
thing to do.
Attached to this mail:
I/ reconnectError_01: traces of complete test (with debug and AT debug).
Test done:
1) board boot
2) Connection (success), start at line 1058:
connmanctl connect cellular...
3) stop ofono, start at line 1109:
/etc/init.d/ofono stop
4) start ofono, start at line 1348:
/etc/init.d/ofono start
5) Connection (error), start at line 2018:
connmanctl connect cellular...
I don't have PPP debug in this trace but here is what happens at PPP
level when Ofono is stopped:
ofonod[944]:
../ofono-1.24/drivers/atmodem/gprs-context.c:at_gprs_detach_shutdown() cid 0
ofonod[944]: PPP: lcp: pppcp_generate_event: current state 9:OPENED
ofonod[944]: PPP: event: 3 (Close), action: 8224, new_state: 4 (CLOSING)
ofonod[944]: PPP: lcp: pppcp_initialize_restart_count: current state
9:OPENED
ofonod[944]: PPP: lcp: pppcp_send_terminate_request: current state 9:OPENED
ofonod[944]: PPP: ipcp: pppcp_generate_event: current state 9:OPENED
ofonod[944]: PPP: event: 1 (Down), action: 201, new_state: 1 (STARTING)
ofonod[944]: PPP: ../ofono-1.24/gatchat/gatppp.c:ppp_enter_phase() 5
ofonod[944]: ../ofono-1.24/src/gprs.c:gprs_context_unregister()
0xc10ed0, 0xc10d90
ofonod[944]: ../ofono-1.24/src/gprs.c:gprs_context_remove() atom: 0xc10ef0
ofonod[944]:
../ofono-1.24/drivers/atmodem/gprs-context.c:at_gprs_context_remove()
ofonod[944]: ../ofono-1.24/src/gprs.c:gprs_unregister() 0xc10d90
Terminate request is sent and then gprs-context atom is removed before
Terminate Ack is received.
II/ 0001-PPP-send-escape-sequence-when-ofono-dies.patch
The patch I made to fix the problem. The idea is to immediately send
escape sequence when removing gprs-context atom. This patch is not ready
to be sent (at least it must be split in two patches). Can you tell me
what you think about this patch?
Best Regards,
Christophe Ronco
3 years, 9 months
[PATCH] plugin: Don't unload external plugins too early
by Slava Monich
Plugins may reference data structures allocated by each other.
They all need to be deinitialized first, only then it should be
safe to unload the libraries.
---
src/plugin.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/plugin.c b/src/plugin.c
index 2c9c619..924a45e 100644
--- a/src/plugin.c
+++ b/src/plugin.c
@@ -190,17 +190,26 @@ void __ofono_plugin_cleanup(void)
DBG("");
+ /*
+ * Terminate the plugins but don't unload the libraries yet.
+ * Plugins may reference data structures allocated by each other.
+ */
for (list = plugins; list; list = list->next) {
struct ofono_plugin *plugin = list->data;
if (plugin->active == TRUE && plugin->desc->exit)
plugin->desc->exit();
+ }
+
+ /* Second pass - unload the libraries */
+ for (list = plugins; list; list = list->next) {
+ struct ofono_plugin *plugin = list->data;
if (plugin->handle)
dlclose(plugin->handle);
-
- g_free(plugin);
}
- g_slist_free(plugins);
+ /* Finally, free the memory */
+ g_slist_free_full(plugins, g_free);
+ plugins = NULL;
}
--
1.9.1
3 years, 9 months
[PATCH 1/1] gprs: store APN in settings for auto-discovered contexts
by Christophe Ronco
APN has to be stored in settings file after it is modified in
ofono_gprs_cid_activated function.
---
src/gprs.c | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/gprs.c b/src/gprs.c
index 377eced..22d5e36 100644
--- a/src/gprs.c
+++ b/src/gprs.c
@@ -2063,6 +2063,13 @@ void ofono_gprs_cid_activated(struct ofono_gprs *gprs, unsigned int cid,
strcpy(pri_ctx->context.apn, apn);
+ if (gprs->settings) {
+ g_key_file_set_string(gprs->settings, pri_ctx->key,
+ "AccessPointName", apn);
+ storage_sync(gprs->imsi, SETTINGS_STORE,
+ gprs->settings);
+ }
+
ofono_dbus_signal_property_changed(conn, pri_ctx->path,
OFONO_CONNECTION_CONTEXT_INTERFACE,
"AccessPointName",
--
2.7.4
3 years, 10 months
[qmimodems] gprs context provisioning versus automatically discovered contexts in LTE
by Christophe Ronco
Hi,
I am doing a test with a 4G SIM card with APN set in provisionning. I
've recently upgraded my Ofono version to 1.23.
My card gets LTE attach quickly, before it gets ServiceProviderName from
SIM card.
So ofono_gprs_cid_activated is called by get_lte_attach_param_cb
(drivers/qmimodem/gprs.c) and a context is created with APN discovered
in get_lte_attach_param_cb.
Then SIM ServiceProviderName is discovered and provision_contexts is
called. Another context is created with APN from provisioning file.
I end up with 2 contexts using same APN or different APNs, depending on
what I wrote in my provisioning file. I attached logs with same APN case.
In messages_02.txt:
- ofono_gprs_cid_activated is called at line 681
- __ofono_gprs_provision_get_settings is called at line 753
I end up with two contexts (properties summary in gsmdiag_02.txt).
Another strange thing in ofono gprs file for this SIM card:
root@klk-lpbs-06029C:~ # cat /etc/network/ofono/208013004789734/gprs
[Settings]
Powered=true
RoamingAllowed=false
[context1]
Name=orange-mib
AccessPointName=
Username=
Password=
AuthenticationMethod=chap
Type=internet
Protocol=ip
[context2]
Name=Internet
AccessPointName=orange-mib
Username=
Password=
AuthenticationMethod=chap
Type=internet
Protocol=ip
Context 1 has no APN. I don't know what would happen if I restart Ofono
and gets attached on 3G. I don't know if this is a bug or not.
Here are the "problems" I saw. And I don't know what to do in this case.
I mean I don't know what result I should have.
What should happen if context information are the same in provisioning
and from network discovery? Maybe only one context?
What should happen if context information are different in provisioning
and from network discovery? Creation of 2 contexts and 1 gets
automatically connected? Disconnection of the automatically connected
context and creation of context using information from provisionning?
Provisionning ignored?
Best Regards,
Christophe
3 years, 10 months
